5 Comments
5/14/2015 12:49:39 pm
This is just the kind of factual info that should have been researched and presented before the decision to put in palms as replacements for the oaks. I am not saying that the oaks did not need to be removed. I am only saying that more research into the facts should have been done Not too late however. City government needs to reexamine and regroup.
Reply
Jon Alexander
5/14/2015 05:58:10 pm
The Board appears to have forgotten to do their homework before voting. The facts speak for themselves. Plant Oak Trees!
Reply
Tom Watson
5/15/2015 04:36:13 am
The Mount Dora tree replacement issue touches upon several areas of importance to residents, business owners and visitors -- economic, ecological, aesthetic and emotional. There are many viable options available other than the current plan, at no significantly greater expense, and almost any of them would have a more positive long-term impact on these areas of importance than the current plan. I never expected to see downtown Eustis be more attractive than downtown Mount Dora, but such is now the case.
Reply
5/16/2015 12:53:25 am
i was ask by former mayor mel demarco to attend a CC meeting a few years back about the new landscape plan and the overwhelming use of palm trees. It was my understanding that at that time the planners were ask to put in as many oaks as possible and keep our large trees.
Reply
Kathy May
6/2/2015 12:13:26 pm
Yes, PLEASE PLEASE save our trees..After visiting so many cute towns with tree-lined shade trees, I know there are viable options..PLEASE!
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
June 2016
CategoriesMount Dora Buzz
Interesting and timely articles from the Mount Dora Buzz. |