8 Comments
David Pals
2/25/2019 09:08:29 am
In this happened in Chicago, there would be suspicions about the sales transaction. Who was the seller? What was the rush to buy the property? Did the city overpay for the property?
Reply
Susy
2/25/2019 01:56:42 pm
I was under the impression that the sellers of said property were moving one of the old existing buildings to another property they purchased in the city.
Reply
Andrew
2/25/2019 08:32:31 pm
Even the average home buyer should have been smarter about a Real Estate transaction. This is your higher taxes at work and even more proof that Mount Dora is not properly prepared for the growth it has undertaken.
Reply
JC
2/26/2019 09:52:09 am
WOW! just WOW! I agree w/Andrew above. It’s scary to think that the city wouldn’t have covered their bases first. Funny, I don’t see the actual reason in the article as to WHY they dIdn’t do their due diligence first. Just when I thought I’d seen everything!!!! WOW!!!!
Reply
Ed Bixby
2/27/2019 07:38:52 am
First of all...dumb city of mt. dora... really dumb..2nd..historic preserve board run amuck..just silly to value blogs as they did..not much more than trash..
Reply
william seaward
2/27/2019 08:26:50 am
Am I missing something? If the city council appoints the Historic Commission, then the city council should also have the authority to ignore the Commission's recommendations. Which is all they should ever be, recommendations. Please don't misunderstand, I am a big fan of historic preservation; but that yellow house on the corner is a dump. At least knock that down to create parking, even if the remainder of the property is rehabbed.
Reply
Cap’n Mike
2/27/2019 10:43:41 pm
Yawn, a no brainer, parking is needed, the 4 hour park time limit is not !...yawn !
Reply
Nosmo King
2/28/2019 01:33:13 am
This seems to be a failure to follow through on “due diligence” by the city once again.
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
January 2025
Categories |